This week Japan had the chance to consider two of its long-standing marriage laws this week, when the Supreme Court will consider claims brought by five women.
The two issues at stake are the ban on women marrying for six months after divorce – this is a stipulation that does not apply to men – and the requirement that spouses have the same surname.
The first of these laws derives from the desire to determine parentage of children born as a marriage is breaking down, in an age before DNA tests. The second stems from the Japanese social system called koseki: a method of family registry that goes back to Japan’s feudal family system. That feudal system was abolished in 1948 but these two laws remained.
The five women argued the laws are unconstitutional and violate married couples’ civil rights.
On Wednesday 16 December, the Supreme Court ruled that the six-month marriage ban for women should be shortened to 100 days, but it upheld the requirement for both spouses to have the same name.
The former is a very minor victory, and it will help women who have children with a new partner shortly after their previous marriage had dissolved. But the latter is a major blow for women’s rights.
One of the women bringing the suit, translator Kaori Oguni, told The Guardian:
“By losing your surname … you’re being made light of, you’re not respected … It’s as if part of your self vanishes.”
Although there is no legal requirement that the woman must take the man’s name as opposed to the other way round, in practice it is the woman who changes her name in 96% of marriages.
Those opposed to the women’s lawsuit – conservative politicians and social commentators – felt that a change in this requirement would undermine the cohesion of the traditional family unit. But, as Ogani continued: “If changing surnames is so easy, why don’t more men do it?”
According to a poll by the Japanese newspaper, Asahi Shimbun, 52% of the Japanese population believed that couples should have the right to choose what name each spouses should have, while 34% opposed the change.
As it currently stands, many Japanese working women are forced to operate under dual identities: one for the workplace and one for the home. This doesn’t look set to change anytime soon.
For a round-up of marital naming laws and customs around the world, the BBC has done a report on this, which can be read here.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.