The case of former beauty queen Pauline Chai and her businessman husband, Khoo Kay Peng, is one of the largest and most complex to come before the English courts. The couple were married for 43 years, as the Malaysian businessman built up a multi-million pound empire, which includes high street name Laura Ashley.
Their divorce began in 2013, when the wife Ms. Chai, represented by Vardags, issued a petition for divorce in London. The husband disputed that she had the necessary link to England to do so, and so issued his own petition in Malaysia. For nearly two years, the parties fought over the correct jurisdiction for the case to be heard.
Ms. Chai argued that the case should be heard in England, based on her habitual residence in their property in Hertfordshire. She also feared that she would be unable to receive a fair settlement given her husband’s influence in Malaysia. Mr Justice Bodey noted that Ms. Chai did not share the same meaningful connections with Malaysia as her husband. Although the couple were both originally from Malaysia and married there, Ms. Chai left the country in 1980, whilst her husband continued living and working there. Ms. Chai moved with their five children to Australia, Canada, and then the UK, living apart from her husband for much of the marriage.
The husband argued that Ms. Chai was a ‘forum-shopper’ and had petitioned in England purely to obtain a greater financial settlement than she would be awarded in Malaysia. This was rejected on the basis that there was not sufficient evidence to suggest that the Malaysian Court would have awarded Ms. Chai a significantly smaller settlement.
Mr Justice Bodey, of the English High Court, ultimately ruled that England was the correct forum, a ruling later approved by the Court of Appeal.
Mr Justice Bodey followed the general starting point of the courts in deciding a financial settlement, which is the ‘yardstick of equality’ - the principle of equal sharing of matrimonial assets. In doing so, he rejected the husband’s claims that this should be departed from on the basis of taking ‘a sideways look’ at Malaysian law, as well arguments related to pre-acquired wealth and special contribution.
In April 2017, Pauline Chai was awarded a £64 million divorce settlement, one of the largest ever recorded.
If you are considering or going through a divorce, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
Chai v Peng EWHC 3518 (Fam) Chai v Peng EWHC 3519 (Fam) Chai v Peng EWHC 1519 (Fam) Chai v Peng EWHC 750 (Fam)
The £64m divorce that shows English courts recognise each spouse’s role in a marriage (The Times)
Laura Ashley boss and wife mired in financial dispute end marriage (Guardian)
Laura Ashley boss ordered to make his wife an offer in ’titanic’ £440m divorce battle (Telegraph)
Court orders Laura Ashley boss to settle ’titanic’ divorce case (Guardian)
Tycoon’s wife gets decree nisi in London court (The Straits Times)
Laura Ashley boss told to ‘stop carping about cashflow’ and pay wife £500,000 (The Times)
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.