Earlier this week, I wrote on Sir James Munby’s speech to the Family Law Bar Association in which he said that the Red Book (the Family Procedure Rules) were fit only for the bonfire.
This was in part inspired by an increasing number of litigants-in-person in family law proceedings. Reports published earlier this year showed that there had been a 22 percent increase in cases involving contact with children in which neither party was represented.
Statistics show that there has been a 30 percent increase across all family court cases in which neither party had legal representation. 80 percent of all family court cases starting in January to March 2013-14 had at least one party who did not have legal representative.
As well as the emotional challenges facing litigants-in-person in family proceedings, the family procedure rules themselves do not lend themselves particularly well to those who are not lawyers. Sir James Munby commented that the family procedure rules need to be overhauled and simplified in order to assist the increasing number of litigants-in-person. As an example, this blog takes one rule in the family procedure rules to demonstrate the complex language and some of the challenges facing litigants-in-person.
Under the FPR, counting days stipulated in orders is not as straight forward as working out 24-hour periods and going from there.
The relevant rule for the computation of time is FPR 2.9: Computation of time which reads:
2.9
(2) A period of time expressed as a number of days must be computed as clear days.
(3) In this rule ‘clear days’ means that in computing the numbers of days-
(a) the day on which the period begins; and
(b) if the end of the period is defined by reference to an event, the day on which that event occurs,
-are not included.
(4) Where the specified period is seven days or less and includes a day which is not a business day, that day does not count.
(5) When the period specified –
(a) by these rules or a practice direction; or
(b) by any direction or order of the court,
-for doing any act at the court office ends on a day on which the office is closed, that act will be in time if done on the next day on which the court office is open.
Key points to note:
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.