Law Guide
Law Guide
Law Guide
020 7404 9390
Available 24 hours


In the case of UL v BK, the court considered the proper procedure for when a party seeks a freezing order or another emergency, ex parte injunction. Freezing orders are a vital tool in preventing a wealthy party from dissipating assets, but given their severity it is vital that the court follows proper procedures.

In the initial application in UL v BK, this had not been done. The wifes solicitors had failed to set out why it was necessary for them to come to court on an urgent basis and had disregarded all of the necessary safeguards against overzealous orders.

Mr Justice Mostyn gave a scathing judgment, confirming that applications should be made on an ex parte basis only when fully necessary, and that if possible short informal notice should always be given.

The court made it clear that in circumstances where the rules were not followed, then orders should not be made and it is likely that costs orders will be made against the applicants.

The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.


Ayesha Vardag

Founder & President Ayesha Vardag
“Ayesha Vardag - Britain's top divorce lawyer.” 
The Telegraph

Stephen Bence

Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bence
“Dr Stephen Bence is a financial genius.” 
Lewis Marks QC

Emma Gill

Regional Managing Partner - Head of Manchester Emma Gill
“Emma Gill is quite simply the best matrimonial lawyer in the North.” 
Legal 500
This site uses cookies. Find out more. Continued use of this site is deemed as consent.   CLOSE ✖