Following the introduction of ‘no-fault’ divorce in April 2022 through the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, one or both parties may apply for divorce on the basis that relationship has permanently broken. If one party makes a sole application, the other party cannot dispute that the relationship has broken down. Now, divorce may only be contested based on:
However, if a sole application is made, the respondent must acknowledge that they have recieved the divorce petition. Where service of the divorce papers is not acknowledged by the respondent in the relevant time frame then it is always worth prompting them in case it is a genuine error or oversight. If they then fail to respond or outright refuse, other avenues will have to be considered in order to continue the divorce process.
Where service is not being acknowledged, the petitioner can serve the papers via the court bailiff or a process server. These are professionals and using this type of service can reduce the delays that arise when the petitioner tries to deliver the papers personally. The respondent will not be able to claim that they have not received the paperwork since there will be an affidavit or witness statement from the official to confirm that this has happened. The respondent is still expected to send acknowledgement of the papers. If they still fail to do this and the court has the evidence that the papers have been correctly served, then the petitioner will be able to apply for the Decree Nisi after seven days without the acknowledgement of service.
If the respondent is refusing to sign, the petitioner has to apply to the court that the divorce papers are deemed to have been served. The petitioner will need to prove to the court why this order should be granted. The court may require evidence that the papers have been delivered and are being ignored. Any correspondence that has been received by the petitioner from the other party confirming the documents have been received could be used to evidence this. This could include letters, emails or text messages. It is at the judge’s discretion to agree to deemed service.
Where it is not possible to use a process server or deemed service, then the court will expect the petitioner to use other methods to contact the respondent. The petitioner can seek permission to use alternative service to notify the other side about the divorce proceedings. Examples could include serving the papers on a related person (a family member or employer), service by fax or email placing an advert in a paper read by the respondent. There have been examples in other countries of service by social media, such as Facebook, being permitted.
If the court is satisfied that all reasonable enquiries have been made to locate the other party then they may all an application for dispensed service, which allows the proceedings to go ahead without the respondent’s acknowledgment. The courts will only allow this where all other avenues have been exhausted since it can result in the respondent being unaware when the divorce is finalised.
If the petitioner does not have a physical address for the respondent (or they are missing) then the above routes may help in this situation as well. If there are no contact details available, including via other contacts, then the petitioner could apply to the courts for a disclosure order for the respondent if they lasted lived in the UK. If the court finds an address, they can send the divorce papers there and proceed even if there is no response.
If the respondent is presumed dead and there is evidence of this, then the surviving spouse can apply for presumption of death as opposed to starting divorce proceedings.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.