020 7404 9390
Available 24 hours

Ayesha Vardag interviewed by European CEO

22nd September 2016 - John Oxley
Ayesha Vardag interviewed by European CEO

Vardags president and founder, Ayesha Vardag, spoke to European CEO about Londons place at the centre of the family law world. She explained the reasons behind Londons place, saying Theres such a concentration of wealth, of economic activity, or dynamism and life here, that that brings an awful lot of people from all over the world here. They make their homes here, and then when they come to divorce in the normal course of things, their divorce goes through the English courts. Theres usually one of the parties – if theyre living here – who wants their divorce here. Partly because its seen as an extremely fair, incorruptible court system. And partly because historically its been very generous.

Ayesha explained that England takes a very different view from the rest of the world when it comes to the division of marital assets. Here, we view marriage very much as a partnership, and what you build up during that partnership, absent any agreement to the contrary, gets divided up broadly equally, she explained.

She went on to discuss the advantages to the country of being such a legal capital. The treasury benefits immensely from this industry; its whats keeping the courts actually going. And its the big cases going through here, generating a lot of tax revenue, that pays for the courts to run the small cases through, she said.

The magazine also asked Ayesha about how the courts approach cases when liquidity has to be extracted from a company. She answered Theyll try to keep their shareholdings intact, and look at what other assets are around property and other holdings, and distribute the award using those before adding, It could be very workable. Shareholders dont necessarily have to like each other; they dont have to work together actively. Its a question of being able to hive off that part of the value to the claiming spouse, and therefore not disturbing the overall shareholding in the company. And I think thats something the courts are going to have to be much more creative about.

This site uses cookies. Find out more. Continued use of this site is deemed as consent.   CLOSE ✖