What is Litigation ================== Litigation involves an individual, organisation or business taking legal action, usually in court, to resolve a dispute that has arisen. The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) govern how all claims are managed by the courts and set out how parties should behave. What types of cases can be resolved using litigation? ----------------------------------------------------- A wide range of issues that can be resolved via litigation, including but not limited to: > - Employment matters > - Personal injury claims > - Judicial Review > - Commercial disputes > - Divorce and child related matters Which courts are involved? -------------------------- The court or tribunal that will deal with the matter depends on the facts of the case and whether there is a specialist arena, such as an employment tribunal. Other factors that can affect which court or tribunal is used include the value of the claim; if it is less than £100,000, the case will probably start in a county court, anything over that will probably begin in the High Court. Who can bring a civil litigation claim? --------------------------------------- This is a question of jurisdiction. Principally, the defendant (the offending party) must live close to the court that is chosen to issue the claim, or the cause of the action must arise within a court's jurisdiction. Of course, there may also be contractual stipulations surrounding where a case may be issued. This can be a tricky area of law to understand and the consequences of getting it wrong could lead to a claim being dismissed before it gets off the ground. The overriding objective ------------------------ Underpinning litigation is something termed 'the overriding objective'. This principal enables the court to deal with cases fairly and at a cost proportionate to the facts in dispute. Key considerations are: > - Ensuring parties comply with court orders and procedural rules > - Making sure a case is dealt with in such a way as to be commensurate to the value of the case, its importance, and the intricacies of the issues involved > - Saving costs > - Active and fair case management These must be taken into account at each stage of the process. So, whether a court order demands you take certain steps, or the CPR directs it, you must do so in the manner set out. And if a deadline or time limit has been set, within those constraints. The court has the power to impose penalties on those who fail to comply, whether by accident or design. Penalties include costs being awarded against the offending party or the striking out of all or part of your claim. Before starting a claim ----------------------- As part of the case management process structured by the CPR, there are certain things that the parties are encouraged to do before issuing a claim. These are called pre-action protocols. There are thirteen of them in all, the most commonly used involve: > - The claimant sending a letter before action, setting out how the claim has arisen, an indication of the loss suffered, and remedy sought. The letter should also set a deadline for response. > - Letter of response from the offending party. This should be sent to the claimant within 14-21 days and confirm whether or not the claim is admitted. It is not unusual for the other party to ignore the letter and remain silent. Unfortunately, such silence generally precipitates the issuing of proceedings. > - Letter of settlement can be sent by either party setting out any issues that remain in dispute and proposals for settling the matter. It is important to say that it is not mandatory under the CPR for either party to make a proposal for settlement. If no specific pre-action protocol applies, then the Practice Direction Pre-Action Protocol should be used. Failing to adhere to a protocol may cause the court to criticise the party's conduct and issue a costs penalty. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) ------------------------------------ At every stage of the process, particularly early on, the parties are encouraged to resolve the issues in dispute by using ADR. The main types of ADR include: conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. The primary advantages to solving the matter this way is that costs are dramatically reduced, there is greater flexibility and it is certainly faster than going through a lengthy court case. A decision is usually made on the documentary evidence the parties send in and there is not always a need for the parties to attend meetings. It is an important consideration when deciding to engage in an ADR process that *some* ADR schemes can be legally binding. So, if you accept a decision during ADR, but later change your mind, you cannot take your case to court. **Click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert solicitors.** [BOOK MY FREE CONSULTATION](https://vardags.com/contact) The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you. What our clients say -------------------- Me and my son will forever will be grateful that we had such a wonderful team protecting us in such difficult times. Rahul Verma The Vardags team are exceptionally knowledgable and strategic but also, and most importantly, they are confident and reassuring in a time when one can feel most vulnerable. Robert Douge Outstanding firm and of highest level of professionalism. I would highly recommend Vardags as best in class in what they do. Sandip Kotecha Thanks to Emma and the team for the outstanding handling of my case. Throughout the months of my ongoing case I was kept informed and updated at all times never left wondering what was happening or where I stood. From meeting... Emma I felt instantly that my case was in good (understatement) hands, she has a friendly personal approach as well as so much expertise in the handling of family law cases. I feel so grateful to have had Emma and her team handle my case and for the outcome! Thank you! Emily Calvin Throughout my time using Vardags I felt that I have always been in the best possible hands. I enjoyed an excellent level of service and received accurate and precise legal advice. The lawyers are hugely talented, sensitive and... focused on getting the very best results. Their no-nonsense and direct approach is most valuable when time and costs are of the essence. I highly recommend them over and above any other law firm I have ever dealt with. Thank you Vardags. Valerie Nicola and the team are the best support you could ask for at the most difficult of times. As well as being knowledgeable, forward thinking, organised and hard-working, she has empathy and goes above and beyond for her clients. C