How are salary payments and bonuses treated by the courts on divorce? ===================================================================== [Ayesha Vardag](https://vardags.com/solicitors/ayesha-vardag) | Founder & President | 20th June 2025 Generally speaking, future earnings , which represent the future sources of income that a party in a divorce will receive, are not classified as a matrimonial asset to which the sharing principle applies (see the case of [Waggott v Waggott](https://vardags.com/law-guide/important-divorce-cases/waggot-v-waggot)). However, this does not mean that such income is not taken into account as a resource and relevant for the purposes of calculating a spousal maintenance order. **If you're considering or going through a divorce and have substantial salary or bonus payments involved, we can help. Click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.** [MAKE A CONFIDENTIAL ENQUIRY](https://vardags.com/contact "MAKE A CONFIDENTIAL ENQUIRY") **How will the family court consider my Salary?** ------------------------------------------------- During the process of financial proceedings upon a divorce, the court expects that the financial status quo should remain the same in the interim. If, for example, one party was financially dependent on the other prior to separation, then the expectation would be that this provision would continue through an arrangement of interim maintenance (provided, of course, that the paying party continues to have sufficient income to meet such maintenance). In a financial settlement, salary is treated differently to those matrimonial assets which are divided upon divorce. Divorcing spouses do not have a sharing claim in relation to the other's salary and instead the court will consider salary in the context of [needs](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/the-needs-principle) - in particular, whether a spousal maintenance order is appropriate because, for example, the matrimonial assets in the pot are not sufficient to meet a party's needs. With that being said, the courts will expect the parties to maximise their earning capacities after a divorce and so the terms of any maintenance payments should only be so long as to allow the recipient to do so and meet their needs. The prevailing wind is to avoid the ordering of spousal maintenance where possible and actually, the courts have a duty to consider whether a clean break is possible in any given case. As a result, alternative mechanisms are available whereby maintenance can be capitalised into a lump sum for the recipient to invest and drawdown annually - creating a source of income without the ongoing attachment which spousal maintenance via periodical maintenance payments entails. This not only avoids a situation where one party remains financially linkedto the other, but a lump sum can also provide more financial security to a partyin the long term. **What happens to bonuses on divorce?** ---------------------------------------- The court's approach to bonuses varies depending upon when the bonus was earned. ### Bonus which has already been received Bonuses that a party is already in receipt of during divorce proceedings that are sitting in a bank account and not utilised towards day-to-day expenses are likely to be considered as a capital resource - like a pot of savings. Such bonuses are treated as matrimonial and therefore subject to the [principle of sharing](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/the-sharing-principle). ### Bonus earned during marriage but not yet received A similar principle applies to those bonuses which have not yet been received but were earned during the marriage. ### Bonus earned post-separation If the bonus was earned post-separation, however, it may be treated as non-matrimonial in nature. There is, nonetheless, a line of case law (stemming from the case of Rossi v Rossi) to the effect that a post-separation bonus should not be classed as non-matrimonial unless it relates to a period which commenced at least 12 months after separation. Moreover, even where classified as non-matrimonial, such bonuses can still be invaded for the purposes of meeting needs. ### Future and discretionary bonuses Future bonuses are more likely to be treated as an income resource, which may not be shared on divorce but will be considered as a financial resource to meet the needs of both parties if necessary. Such bonuses may be discretionary. These bonuses are often paid as an annual reward following a successful year. Since discretionary bonuses are not guaranteed and are subject to certain conditions, they may be treated differently than guaranteed bonuses. The court will consider the likelihood of receiving a discretionary bonus when determining the value of the bonus in the context of financial remedy proceedings. Again, the court will first consider the financial 'needs' of the spouses in making any orders. For example, in H v W \[2013\] EWHC 4105 (Fam) the bonus in question had historically accounted for a significant proportion of the parties' income and was relied upon throughout the marriage. The judge at first instance ordered that 25% of that bonus be paid to the dependent spouse annually for maintenance. On appeal, a cap was imposed upon this award. To ensure fairness, in such instances, maintenance is limited to a level that does not exceed what was required to meet the claiming spouse's needs as determined by the judge. ### deferred stock schemes Deferred stock schemes add another layer of complexity. Whilst over time the amount of a cash bonus might fluctuate in 'real' terms, the future value of a deferred stock scheme is even less predictable. The two most common types of deferred stock schemes in family law matters are: - Stock options - where employees are offered shares at a particular price which vest on a certain future date (commonly in 3 years). - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) - where employees are granted a certain number of shares each year without any purchase. As with other bonuses, the courts have been seen to grapple with how deferred bonuses should be dealt with upon divorce: a) Capital to be shared as any other matrimonial asset; or b) Income, to be considered as a financial resource in the context of needs. **Conclusion** -------------- **In summary, the courts approach is that:** - Bonuses earned during marriage should be considered capital matrimonial assets and be shared, however bonuses earned after separation generally should not (subject to the 12 month rule). - However, if the financially weaker party's future income needs cannot be met by sharing half of the marital assets, including bonuses earned during the marriage, then post-separation income which includes potential bonuses awarded after separation, can be used to pay maintenance or as an additional lump sum to meet their future financial needs. *Vardags' team of top divorce lawyers delivers a bespoke legal service to HNW and UHNW individuals, their families, and businesses.* Related Guides -------------- [How are art collections and jewellery treated in a divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/art-and-jewellery-in-divorce "How are art collections and jewellery treated in a divorce?") [How are businesses treated by the courts on divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/businesses-on-divorce "How are businesses treated by the courts on divorce?") [How are car collections treated by the court in divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/cars-in-a-divorce "How are car collections treated by the court in divorce?") [Crypto Assets in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/crypto-assets-in-a-divorce "Crypto Assets in Divorce") [How are different assets, incomes, and liabilities treated by the courts?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/assets-income-liabilities-on-divorce "How are different assets, incomes, and liabilities treated by the courts?") [How Farms Are Treated in Divorce Settlements](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/farms-in-a-divorce "How Farms Are Treated in Divorce Settlements") [How are horses treated by courts in a divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/horses-in-a-divorce "How are horses treated by courts in a divorce?") [How are liabilities and debts treated by courts in divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/debt-and-liabilties-in-divorce "How are liabilities and debts treated by courts in divorce?") [How are offshore assets treated in a divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/offshore-assets-in-divorce "How are offshore assets treated in a divorce?") [Family Assets in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/family-assets-in-divorce "Family Assets in Divorce") [Pensions in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/pensions-in-divorce "Pensions in Divorce") [Who Gets the Pet in a Divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/pets-in-a-divorce "Who Gets the Pet in a Divorce?") [How are properties treated by the courts on divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/properties-on-divorce "How are properties treated by the courts on divorce?") [How is my yacht treated by courts in divorce?](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/yacht-in-a-divorce "How is my yacht treated by courts in divorce?") Glossary Reference ------------------ ### Matrimonial property Matrimonial property refers to assets and income which are created or earned during the course of the marriage. ### Non-matrimonial property Non-matrimonial property refers to assets that were built up other than during the marriage. ### Sharing principle Where the parties have more than enough assets to meet their needs, the court will consider how those assets should be shared. The starting point will be to divide matrimonial assets 50:50, recognising that spouses are equal partners in a marriage. The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you. AUTHOR ------ Ayesha Vardag "Britain's top divorce lawyer" Ayesha Vardag rose to fame for winning the landmark Supreme Court case of Radmacher v Granatino in 2010, changing the law to make prenuptial agreements legally enforceable in England and Wales. The founder and President of Vardags, Ayesha specialises in high-net-worth divorce, often with an international... [READ MORE](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag") What our clients say -------------------- What should have been the worst year of my life was resurrected by this firm. The Manchester based team of Anne-Marie Bradley and Kate Taylor were exceptional. They treat you as a human being rather than a client. I can't thank... them enough for all their expertise, choice of barrister and expert witness. If I am ever unlucky enough to repeat this horrible episode, they will be my first port of call. Can't recommend these two enough. Mark Gallagher I cannot thank Gareth, Kate, Claire and all the team at Vardags enough for their excellent expertise and professional approach to my divorce case. They have helped me reach a successful conclusion to a process to which I could... see no end. The last three years have been the most traumatic of my life. Their calm and thorough approach and attention to detail reassured me that I was in the best capable hands.They gave me realistic expectations but yet exceeded them. They have definitely lived up to their name of being a top divorce and family law firm. S. Gasparini Vardags aren't cheap, but they are worth it. Steve I would highly recommend AnneMarie Bradley. I found myself in a very difficult position during my divorce. her understanding of the position and making me see this from a different point of view helped me defend my position.... along with a defence it placed me in a driving position and saved me a lot of money. The end result was justice and I will be forever grateful. Dale Heathcote Very comprehensive service with excellent in house expertise. They helped me achieve an outcome that was beyond my expectations. Paul Stringer The review itself is not so much about the Firm but about a singular solicitor who I had the absolute pleasure to have as my solicitor in what I can only describe as the hardest time in my life! her name is Amie Pine. Matt Ballard