Hadkinson Orders
================



seeking compliance with a court order 
--------------------------------------

Securing a satisfactory maintenance order or achieving a valuable financial settlement after a divorce is often just the beginning. Even when there seems to be an abundance of marital assets, enforcing a financial order can still be quite challenging.

If you need to enforce a court order against an uncooperative spouse, there are several options available. One effective method is a Hadkinson order, which is especially useful if the non-compliant spouse is simultaneously pursuing any type of application against you in the case.

**If you're currently going through a divorce or have already divorced and your spouse is not adhering to court orders, we are well-equipped to assist you. Click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.**

[BOOK FREE CONSULTATION](https://vardags.com/contact "BOOK FREE CONSULTATION")

what is a hadkinson order?
--------------------------

A Hadkinson order is an unusual order but can be vital in the right circumstances. Where a party is in breach of a court orders, for example if they have failed to pay money or provide disclosure, a Hadkinson order will prevent them from making other applications and being heard in court proceedings until they have complied with the order which they are breaching. It is called a Hadkinson order from the eponymouse case *Hadkinson v Hadkinson* \[1952\] P 285.

For example, there may be a situation in which a spouse who is not fulfilling their court-ordered obligation to make regular maintenance payments is wanting to apply to the court to reduce these payments. Since failing to make the payments is considered contempt of court, the other spouse can request a Hadkinson order to prevent the non-paying spouse from applying to change the maintenance payments. This is an important way of ensuring court orders are complied with and can be very helpful in the right case.

Hadkinson orders are typically used as a last resort, where there is no other effective means of securing a party's compliance.

### hadkinson v hadkinson

*Hadkinson v Hadkinson* concerned a mother's removal of a child abroad following her divorce with the child's father, in defiance of a court order. The mother was ordered to return the children to England, but she failed to do so. She sought to appeal the court's decision, but the Court of Appeal held that she could not proceed with her appeal whilst she was in contempt of court. The case established that parties must comply with a court's decision before they can seek further legal action - hence 'Hadkinson orders'.

when will the court make a hadkinson order?
-------------------------------------------

Hadkinson orders are seen as quite a draconian measure, as they prevent the party in breach from bringing applications to the family court. In the case of [*De Gafforj (Appeal - Hadkinson Order)* \[2018\] EWCA Civ 2070](https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2018/2070.html), Peter Jackson LJ provided a helpful summary of the conditions which must be met for a Hadkinson order to be made, namely:

> 1. The respondent must be in contempt;
> 2. The contempt is deliberate and continuing;
> 3. As a result, there is an impediment to the course of justice;
> 4. There is no other realistic and effective remedy; and
> 5. The order is proportionate to the problem and goes no further than necessary to remedy it.

### caselaw example: DS v HR \[2019\]

The case [*DS v HR* \[2019\] EWHC 2425 (Fam)](https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2019/2425.html) concerned a wife's application for a Hadkinson order following what the judge described as "some of the least attractive and commercially suicidal litigation". The husband was in breach of a court order to pay child maintenance for their two children, having stopped paying after a [costs order](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/costs-orders) was made against him. The wife succeeded in obtaining a Hadkinson order against the husband, which preventing him from appealing the costs order.

This case was interesting as it marked the first use of a Hadkinson order in proceedings which were not the same, but were related. The husband was prevented from appealing a costs order made in Family Law Act proceedings, unless he complied with the order for child maintenance which was made in financial remedy proceedings.

The judge acknowledged that making the order was an extension of the Hadkinson principle, as Hadkinson orders are usually made in proceedings which are the same, but found that this was acceptable as the two proceedings were "intrinsically linked" and highlighted that it was the making of the costs order in the Family Law Act proceedings which directly resulted in the father's refusal to pay the child maintenance ordered in the other proceedings.



About Us
--------

 

Ayesha VardagFounder & President

"A DIVORCE LAWYER WIDELY REGARDED AS ONE OF THE WORLD'S BEST"

The Metro

Vardags offer a unique approach to the law, specially tailored to the needs of HNW individuals. We offer City-quality representation for your divorce and family law needs. Our lawyers come from the very best universities and receive the very best training - they are determined, diligent, and dedicated to getting the best outcome... [read more](https://vardags.com/about-us)

[BOOK FREE CONSULTATION](https://vardags.com/contact)



Related Guides
--------------

[Financial Remedy Orders](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/financial-remedy-orders "Financial Remedy Orders")

[Legal Services Payment Order](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/legal-services-order "Legal Services Payment Order")

[Non-Molestation Orders](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/non-molestation-orders "Non-Molestation Orders")

[Occupation Orders](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/occupation-orders "Occupation Orders")







The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.



What our clients say
--------------------

Throughout my time using Vardags I felt that I have always been in the best possible hands. I enjoyed an excellent level of service and received accurate and precise legal advice. The lawyers are hugely talented, sensitive and...  focused on getting the very best results. Their no-nonsense and direct approach is most valuable when time and costs are of the essence. I highly recommend them over and above any other law firm I have ever dealt with. Thank you Vardags.

Valerie



Knowledgeable, respectful and empathetic service and team.

Michelle Ravden



Beyond the direct legal work they were extremely knowledgeable and creative in coordinating with other service providers when required, which was key in securing a fair financial result and, more importantly, maintaining my...  parental relationship with my young children during the divorce proceedings and beyond. Throughout the whole process they never lost sight of the best long term outcome, whilst always staying on top of procedure and providing flawless execution. I highly recommended them!

Heinz-Peter Stohl



Outstanding, cannot recommend this highly enough.

Mark Curtis



I would, without hesitation, recommend Vardags if you want a highly professional and compassionate legal team to get you to the outcome you desire.

J Rourke



Vardags were outstanding throughout my divorce. They were incredibly supportive from the very first meeting & when my mother passed away a month into the proceedings they were so kind & understanding.

Amanda Allen













OUR LEADERSHIP TEAM
-------------------

[### Ayesha Vardag](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family")

[### Stephen Bence](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO")

[### David Lister](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister")



[Founder & President](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family")

[Chief Executive Officer](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO")

[Senior Partner and Head of London Family - Divorce & Family](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister")



[### Ayesha Vardag

Founder & President ](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family")"Ayesha Vardag - Britain's top divorce lawyer." 

The Telegraph



[### Stephen Bence

Chief Executive Officer](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO")"Dr Stephen Bence is a financial genius." 

Lewis Marks KC



[### David Lister

Senior Partner and Head of London Family - Divorce & Family ](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister")"Brilliant with a real spark which clients love" 

Legal 500







[Meet the rest of the team](https://vardags.com/team)







[Vardags climbs ranks of UK's biggest firms in The Lawyer's UK 200](https://vardags.com/posts/vardags-london-climbs-ranks-of-uks-biggest-firms-in-the-lawyers-uk-200)