Freezing Orders in Divorce: How to Protect Assets from Dissipation ================================================================== What is a freezing order? ------------------------- A freezing order, also called a freezing injunction, is an interim order preventing a party from disposing of their assets. It is a special type of court order which restricts a party's ability to deal with or dispose of their assets. It was previously called a *Mareva* injunction. Under a freezing order, a party is restricted from moving their assets for reasons other than their living expenses and legal fees. This will prevent them from putting that money beyond the reach of the court and will allow you to feel secure that your fair share will be protected. Freezing orders are binding on third parties - banks and financial institutions can get in serious trouble if they help someone breach it. **If you suspect your spouse may attempt to hide their assets, you may be able to obtain a freezing order. Contact Vardags today for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.** [BOOK FREE CONSULTATION](https://vardags.com/contact "BOOK FREE CONSULTATION") when can you apply for a freezing order? ---------------------------------------- If you have good reasons to suspect that your spouse is planning to move assets out of the country or to transfer them to friends, relatives or a trust then you can apply to the court to have those assets frozen. Where there is an immediate risk that assets might be moved, you can apply for an urgent injunction without notice to the other side. This will allow you to have an order in place before your spouse can act. Safeguards against unfair or disproportionate freezing orders ------------------------------------------------------------- The case of [*UL v BK* \[2013\] EWHC 1735 (Fam)](https://vardags.com/law-guide/important-divorce-cases/ul-v-bk) provides a helpful illustration of a freezing order which had "gone seriously wrong" and sets out the necessary safeguards which should be followed to avoid similar occurrences: > "51. The relevant principles and safeguards may be summarised as follows: > > i) The court has a general power to preserve specific tangible assets in specie where they are the subject matter of the claim. Such an order does not necessarily require application of all the freezing order principles and safeguards, although it is open to the court to impose them. > > ii) For a freezing order in a sum of money which is capable of embracing all of the respondent's assets up to the specified figure it is essential that all the principles and safeguards are scrupulously applied. > > iii) Whether the application is made under the 1981 Act or the 1973 Act **the applicant must show, by reference to clear evidence, an unjustified dealing with assets (which would include threats) by the respondent giving rise to the conclusion that there is a solid risk of dissipation of assets to the applicant's prejudice.**Such an unjustified dealing will normally give rise to the inference that it is done with the intention to defeat the applicant's claim (and such an intention is presumed in the case of an application under the 1973 Act). > > iv) The evidence in support of the application must depose to clear facts. The sources of information and belief must be clearly set out. > > v) Where the application for a freezing order is made ex parte the applicant has to show that the matter is one of exceptional urgency. Short informal notice must be given to the respondent unless it is essential that he is not made aware of the application. No notice at all would only be justified where there is powerful evidence that the giving of any notice would likely lead the respondent to take steps to defeat the purpose of the injunction, or where there is literally no time to give any notice before the order is required to prevent the threatened wrongful act. Cases where no notice at all can be justified are very rare indeed. The order of the court should record on its face the reason why it was satisfied that no or short notice was given. > > vi) Where no notice, or short informal notice, is given the applicant is fixed with a high duty of candour. Breach of that duty will likely lead to a discharge of the order. The applicable principles on the re-grant of the order after discharge are set out in Arena Corporation v Schroeder at para 213. > > vii) Where no notice, or short informal notice, is given the safeguards assume critical importance. The safeguards are set out in the standard examples for freezing and search orders. If an applicant seeks to dis-apply any safeguard the court must be made unambiguously aware of this and the departure must be clearly justified. The giving of an undertaking in damages, whether to the respondent or to an affected third party, is an almost invariable requirement; release of this must be clearly justified." A further takeaway from the judgment is that the applicant must demonstrate that there is a real risk of the defendant removing their assets from the jurisdiction or otherwise dissipating or disposing of them - suspicion or fear is not enough. About Us -------- Ayesha VardagFounder & President "A DIVORCE LAWYER WIDELY REGARDED AS ONE OF THE WORLD'S BEST" The Metro Vardags offer a unique approach to the law, specially tailored to the needs of HNW individuals. We offer City-quality representation for your divorce and family law needs. Our lawyers come from the very best universities and receive the very best training - they are determined, diligent, and dedicated to getting the best outcome... [read more](https://vardags.com/about-us) [BOOK FREE CONSULTATION](https://vardags.com/contact) Related Guides -------------- [Financial Non-Disclosure in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/financial-non-disclosure-in-divorce "Financial Non-Disclosure in Divorce") [Form E Explained: Financial Disclosure in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/form-e "Form E Explained: Financial Disclosure in Divorce") [Legal Services Payment Order](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/legal-services-order "Legal Services Payment Order") [Setting aside a financial order due to non-disclosure](https://vardags.com/law-guide/how-the-courts-decide-a-financial-settlement/setting-aside-a-financial-order-due-to-non-disclosure "Setting aside a financial order due to non-disclosure") [Setting Aside Transactions in Divorce](https://vardags.com/law-guide/financial-proceedings/setting-aside-a-transaction "Setting Aside Transactions in Divorce") [My spouse is hiding assets in offshore bank accounts and companies, what can I do?](https://vardags.com/faq/divorce/spouse-hiding-assets-offshore "My spouse is hiding assets in offshore bank accounts and companies, what can I do?") Glossary Reference ------------------ ### Freezing order An order of the court typically made without notice, preventing one party from disposing of their assets. The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you. What our clients say -------------------- Throughout my time using Vardags I felt that I have always been in the best possible hands. I enjoyed an excellent level of service and received accurate and precise legal advice. The lawyers are hugely talented, sensitive and... focused on getting the very best results. Their no-nonsense and direct approach is most valuable when time and costs are of the essence. I highly recommend them over and above any other law firm I have ever dealt with. Thank you Vardags. Valerie Knowledgeable, respectful and empathetic service and team. Michelle Ravden Beyond the direct legal work they were extremely knowledgeable and creative in coordinating with other service providers when required, which was key in securing a fair financial result and, more importantly, maintaining my... parental relationship with my young children during the divorce proceedings and beyond. Throughout the whole process they never lost sight of the best long term outcome, whilst always staying on top of procedure and providing flawless execution. I highly recommended them! Heinz-Peter Stohl Outstanding, cannot recommend this highly enough. Mark Curtis My experience with Vardags has been exceptional. They helped me through all the complicated bureaucracy and process involved in dissolving my Civil Partnership. I would, without hesitation, recommend Vardags if you want a highly... professional and compassionate legal team to get you to the outcome you desire. J Rourke I feel they got the best outcome possible for me whilst supporting me through a challenging & difficult time in my life. I have no hesitation in recommending them. Amanda Allen OUR LEADERSHIP TEAM ------------------- [### Ayesha Vardag](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family") [### Stephen Bence](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO") [### David Lister](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister") [Founder & President](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family") [Chief Executive Officer](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO") [Senior Partner and Head of London Family - Divorce & Family](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister") [### Ayesha Vardag Founder & President ](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/ayesha-vardag "Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family")"Ayesha Vardag - Britain's top divorce lawyer." The Telegraph [### Stephen Bence Chief Executive Officer](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/stephen-bence "Stephen Bence Vardags CEO")"Dr Stephen Bence is a financial genius." Lewis Marks KC [### David Lister Senior Partner and Head of London Family - Divorce & Family ](https://vardags.com/solicitors/london/david-lister "David Lister")"Brilliant with a real spark which clients love" Legal 500 [Meet the rest of the team](https://vardags.com/team) [Vardags climbs ranks of UK's biggest firms in The Lawyer's UK 200](https://vardags.com/posts/vardags-london-climbs-ranks-of-uks-biggest-firms-in-the-lawyers-uk-200)