In some cases, parties may be able to agree any child maintenance between them, and therefore if one party wishes to vary the amount paid, the first step will be to raise this with the other party and try to come to a further agreement.
Most commonly, child maintenance is determined by the Child Maintenance Service (CMS). Where the paying party earns an amount not exceeding £156,000 per year, they will be subject to a child maintenance assessment and the child maintenance payable will be calculated through a standard formula by the CMS.
Where the paying party’s income is over £156,000, and the CMS has awarded a “maximum assessment”, the court has jurisdiction to determine additional “top up” child maintenance.
To vary the amount of child maintenance you pay, you can contact the CMS and apply for variation.
The CMS conduct an annual review of each case, but if there have been changes to the paying parent’s circumstances, affecting their income or expenses, or to the child’s living arrangements, the CMS should be notified as soon as possible.
If you believe that the CMS have made a mistake in calculating the child maintenance payable, you can dispute this and ask them to look at their decision again. Whether they determine that their original award was correct or incorrect, you can appeal that reconsideration decision within one month of receiving their decision. If you appeal later than this,you will need to explain the delay.
An appeal form will be provided by the CMS, and the appeal will then be heard by the First-Tier Tribunal(Social Security and Child Support). There are specific issues that cannot be heard by the tribunal due to a lack of jurisdiction, such as:
The court does not have the power to make or vary child maintenance orders where the CMS has jurisdiction. Where the court has jurisdiction and has made an order for child maintenance, such as school fee orders, top-up orders, consent orders, and orders for maintenance for children with special needs, you can apply to appeal or vary the court order in much the same way as for spousal maintenance.
Following the case of AZ v FM [2021] EWFC 2, child maintenance can also be ‘capitalised’, similarly to spousal maintenance. In this case, Mostyn J confirmed that the court has jurisdiction to order child maintenance payments to be ‘capitalised’, meaning that future periodical payments for the benefit of a child can be replaced by one lump sum. He called this a “commutation lump sum” and emphasised that this would only happen in extremely rare circumstances. In this case, the following facts justified a commutation lump sum:
The full scope and application of the court’s power to capitalise child maintenance has not yet been fully defined, but it seems it may be an effective enforcement mechanism in cases where the paying parent has defaulted on payments and lives outside the UK, rendering other tools of enforcement ineffective. In cases like this, it is also more desirable for the court to end the financial ties between the parties, given the costs incurred by "incessant litigation”.
If you believe the amount of child maintenance you are paying, or is being paid to you, is incorrect, contact Vardags today for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.