In UK divorce law, the needs principle is one of the three core doctrines used to determine financial settlements - alongside sharing and compensation. It ensures that both parties, and any dependent children, receive a fair outcome that meets their reasonable financial needs following the breakdown of the marriage.
Legal Basis:
The court applies Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, which outlines the factors used to assess financial needs and obligations.
Needs are assessed generously, especially in high-net-worth cases, and typically include:
The court does not use a fixed formula but considers the context of the marriage, including its duration, the parties’ roles, and their future earning capacity.
Determining ’needs’ does not follow a fixed formula; instead, the Court must consider the factors outlined in Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 when making a financial order. These factors are:
The income, earning capacity, property, and other financial resources each party has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future, including any potential increase in earning capacity that the Court reasonably expects a party to pursue.
The financial needs, obligations, and responsibilities each party has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future.
The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage.
The age of each party and the duration of the marriage.
Any physical or mental disability of either party.
The contributions each party has made or is likely to make to the welfare of the family, including contributions through homemaking or caring for the family.
The conduct of each party, during the marriage or after separation, if the conduct is such that the Court deems it inequitable to disregard it.
In divorce or nullity proceedings, the value of any benefits (such as a pension) that a party will lose due to the dissolution or annulment of the marriage.
In cases involving young children, the Court’s primary concern is always the welfare of the children and how their needs will be met. In most cases, the decisive factor is the reasonable needs of the parties and the children of the family.
Example:
A primary caregiver with limited earning potential may receive a larger share of assets to secure housing and income stability.
While the sharing principle starts from a presumption of equal division, the needs principle can justify an unequal split if one party’s financial requirements are greater.
Case Insight:
In FF v KF, the wife received £4.25 million based on her housing and income needs, despite the husband’s significantly higher wealth.
In wealthier families, the court may assess needs at a higher level, reflecting the lifestyle enjoyed during the marriage. This can include:
If you’re unsure how your financial needs will be assessed in divorce, our expert solicitors can guide you. We offer a free initial consultation to qualifying individuals.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.
