In Collardeau-Fuchs v Fuchs (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 135, Mostyn J introduced the concept of supporting a child through supporting the parent whom the child primarily lives with. He called this a Household Expenditure Award (HECSA), and it is an order for child maintenance which may extend beyond the specific expenses of the child and meet some expenses of the relevant parent.
Such expenses can only be covered by a HECSA where the parent is unable to meet them themselves, and it cannot be used to meet the expenses directly personal to the parent and not related to their role as a caregiver for the child. For example, a HECSA may be made in relation to utility bills, transport, and family holidays.
To determine a reasonable level of household expenses to be covered by a HECSA, Mostyn J directed that the court should look at the parties’ current standard of living, and if relevant, the standard of living enjoyed by them prior to the breakdown of their relationship. The goal is not to replicate exactly the lifestyle the child experienced previously, but the child is entitled to a lifestyle which is “not entirely out of kilter” (HRH Haya Bint Al Hussein v HRH Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum [2021] EWFC 94) with the one they enjoyed prior to the breakdown of their parents’ relationship.
It is important to note that Mostyn J distinguished between Schedule 1 applications and other applications where the parent has no claim for spousal maintenance, from applications for financial relief under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, where child maintenance is a subsidiary claim. A HECSA may only be made in the former cases, for example, where the parties were never married, the applicant has remarried, or spousal maintenance has already been determined by a pre-nuptial or post-nuptial agreement.
If you require advice regarding how much child maintenance you or your former partner should pay, contact Vardags today for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.