Farms present unique challenges in divorce settlements. They often combine business, property, inheritance, and family legacy - making them more complex than typical asset division. UK courts aim to balance fairness with practicality, especially when the farm is a source of income or has been in the family for generations.
It depends. Farms may be:
The court will consider if the farm was owned by one spouse prior to the marriage, and even if it was, it is possible that both parties subsequently invested in additional agricultural property or land to expand operations. The non-farming party may have also contributed financially or have worked on the farm during the course of the marriage. The question of how much input the non-farming spouse had with the running of the farm can be crucial to determining whether it can be classified as a matrimonial asset or not.
Note: Even non-matrimonial farms may be included in the settlement if needed to meet the other party’s financial needs.
When deciding how to treat a farm in divorce, the court will assess:
It is commonplace for farming businesses to be owned by multiple people in the same family, often in the form of a limited company or a partnership. It is also possible that all the farm assets are owned by the parents of a divorcing spouse, adding an additional layer of complexity to the process.
This feeds into point 1 regarding whether the farm is a matrimonial asset. In cases where farms have been inherited, it would have been expected that the business would be handed down for generations.In such cases,, a court is likely to viewthe farm as non-matrimonial and ring-fence it from division.
However, there are additional factors such as the length of the marriage and whether there are any children which need to be considered. If the farm is the most significant asset owned by either party, it may have to be invaded to meet to the other spouse and children’s needs.
It is not unusual for farms to be family-run businesses and for third parties to have vested interests in the company beyond merely owning it. For example, the farm may have a farmhouse which is home to multiple marriedcouples, or several different family members may count on the farm for employment and income. In such cases, the needs of everyone involved will have to be considered when working towards a fair settlement.
Yes, in some cases. If the farm was inherited and kept separate from marital finances, the court may ringfence it, especially if the other party’s needs can be met from other assets. However, if the farm was used to support the family or both parties contributed to its success, it may be treated as a shared asset.
arm valuations can be complex and may include:
Expert agricultural valuers are often instructed to provide accurate assessments.
It is uncommon for a court to order the sale of a farm as part of a divorce settlement. This is mainly because the sale of the farm would take away the farm owner’s source of income and often, also their home. Additionally, in situations where others have an interest in the farm, the sale of a spouse’s share would impact them. However, ultimately, this depends upon the other available assets and the needs of both spouses.
To protect a farm in divorce:
Vardags’ team of top divorce lawyers delivers a bespoke legal service to HNW and UHNW individuals, their families, and businesses.
Our expert family lawyers have extensive experience handling complex agricultural divorces. We can help protect your farming interests while ensuring a fair financial outcome. Contact Vardags today for a free initial consultation.
A: Not automatically. The court may include it in the settlement if needed to meet the other party’s needs.
A: Inherited farms may be ringfenced, but only if they weren’t used for family purposes or mixed with marital assets.
A: Possibly. This is known as offsetting, and it depends on the overall asset pool and needs.
A: Rarely. Courts try to avoid disrupting viable businesses, especially those tied to family legacy.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.
