Please note that the following guide only applies to divorces started before 4pm on 5th April 2022. For divorces after this date, see our guide to no-fault divorce, which now applies.
Where one spouse has made an allegation of unreasonable behaviour as their ground for divorce and the other party disagrees with this assertion then they are entitled to defend the allegation. Unreasonable behaviour is the most common reason given for the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage since it does not require a long time period to have passed (two or five years for separation or desertion) or an admission to adultery.
When citing unreasonable behaviour as a ground for divorce, the person alleging unreasonable behaviour must show the court that their spouse’s behaviour is so unreasonable that they should not have to remain married to them.
What is unreasonable is fairly subjective but does rely on the court agreeing that the marriage has broken down due to this behaviour. The widely publicised and controversial Supreme Court case of Owens v Owens highlighted that unreasonable behaviour will not be allowed as a basis for divorce if a party is unhappy in the marriage but there is no actual evidence of unreasonable behaviour.
There is no definitive list as to what will be regarded as unreasonable behaviour but examples include:
Abuse, including physical, verbal, emotional and sexual
Neglect
Violence
Harassment
Inappropriate relationship with another person
Financial recklessness
Drug or alcohol abuse
Unreasonable sexual demands
Working unreasonable hours
A spouse that has been served divorce papers has various options if they are unhappy with the allegations of unreasonable behaviour:
It is possible to defend the divorce and state that the relationship has not broken down but this is extremely rare (though this is what happened in the above mentioned case of Owens v Owens). In most cases, both parties agree to the divorce but may disagree on the grounds.
Alternatively, it is possible to challenge the allegation of unreasonable behaviour in order to have this changed. It should be noted that this is likely to have the same result (the divorce is granted) but the process will be longer and more expensive. Another route is for the party accused of unreasonable behaviour to respond to the divorce petition in the Acknowledgment of Service raising their objections or concerns.
If a party agrees that the divorce should proceed but disagrees with the allegation of unreasonable behaviour, then they can make a cross petition, where they put forward their version of events as to why the marriage has broken down. It will be up to the court to decide which petition will be accepted.
Challenging the allegations may not stop the divorce from proceeding, but it can affect how the case is presented. It may also increase the time and costs involved.
No, it’s rare. Most divorces proceed uncontested, even if there are disagreements over the reasons behind the divorce. The case of Owens v Owens is a notable exception where the divorce was defended all the way to the Supreme Court.
A cross-petition may be filed when the respondent agrees that the marriage has broken down but disagrees with the reasons given. Essentially, the cross-petition creates a new petition for divorce, with the respondent’s own version of events and grounds for divorce.
If you’re considering or going through a divorce, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
As of 6 April 2022, England and Wales now has no-fault divorce, meaning that there is no requirement to assign fault or blame as the sole ground for divorce is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, which only needs to be stated by one of the parties. Divorce can no longer be contested unless on technical grounds e.g. if one party disputes the jurisdiction where their spouse has filed for divorce in.
So whilst you can divorce your spouse due to unreasonable behaviour, this cannot be cited specifically when you apply for divorce, nor can you challenge your spouse’s petition for divorce.
The information above is no longer applicable to divorces which have commenced since the introduction of no-fault divorce. However, it has been retained for those interested in what was considered unreasonable behaviour under the old law.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.