Coercive and controlling behaviour was made a criminal offence under the Serious Crime ACt 2015. Coercive control is a form of domestic abuse characterised by a pattern of behaviour which causes the victim to feel controlled, dependent, isolated, humiliated or scared.
Rather than a one-off event, coercive control refers to repeated or continuous pattern of behaviour that causes emotional or psychological harm for the victim. This behaviour can include, but is not limited to, the following:
- Isolating a person from their friends and family;
- Depriving a person of their basic needs;
- Monitoring a person’s social media and their communication with others;
- Controlling aspects of a person’s daily life (for example, who they see, what clothes they wear, how long they take etc.);
- Economic abuse (for example, coerced debt, controlling bank accounts, and taking wages and benefit payments);
- Harassment and stalking;
- Physical abuse;
- Sexual assault.
The above list is non-exhaustive and can vary from one person to the next. If you are experiencing any of the above, please contact our office and speak with our experienced family lawyers to discuss your options moving forwards.
Economic abuse is a form of domestic abuse, where a person interferes with an individual’s ability to acquire, use and maintain economic resources such as money. Economic abuse was recognised as a form of domestic abuse for the first time in 2021, through an amendment to the Domestic Abuse Act.
Economic abuse means any behaviour that has a substantial adverse effect on a person’s ability to:
- Acquire, use or maintain money or other property; or
- Purchase goods or services.
Economic abuse may include, but is not limited to, the following:
- Controlling a person’s spendings/ bank accounts/ investments/ mortgages;
- Controlling the family income;
- Coerced debts (for example, obtaining credit cards and personal loans);
- Taking a person’s wage, government benefits or allowances;
- Preventing a person from having access to finances required to meet their needs.
If you have suffered or been accused of coercive and controlling behaviour or economic abuse, contact Vardags today for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce and family law solicitors.
According to section 25A of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the court has a duty to consider whether a clean break is possible; ultimately, providing financial independence to the parties. In cases involving domestic and financial abuse, it is generally preferred that a clean break is achieved.
There are a number of considerations the court will have regard to when determining the financial award of each case. Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides a non-exhaustive list of matters to be taken into consideration, including the parties’ conduct.
In the case of OC v AG [2020] EWFC 52, Mostyn J provided four scenarios where economic abuse may be considered as conduct. These four scenarios are:
- Gross and obvious personal misconduct where there is a financial consequence;
- Wantonly and recklessly dissipating assets;
- Litigation misconduct; and
- Failure to comply with full and frank disclosure.
The serious impact of domestic abuse may also be relevant when considering maintenance. This is particularly important in circumstances where a victim of domestic abuse is unable to return to work for the foreseeable future having suffered from physical and mental abuse.
If you are unable to speak, call 999 from your mobile and then press 55. This will automatically dispatch police to your location.
Alternatively, you may use the codeword “ANI” (short for ‘Action Needed Immediately’) at your local pharmacy. A member of staff will then take you to a private room where they can help you call the police, domestic abuse helpline, or a family member, friend, or solicitor.
Once you are in safe place and ready to seek legal advice, we recommend that you contact our experienced family law and criminal law team for a confidential chat to discuss your case and the best way forward.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.