When a company changes hands, employees can naturally feel concerned about what this will mean for their employment. However, although employees going through a transfer may feel that their situation is precarious, their rights are protected under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations that are known as TUPE.
TUPE is the mechanism used to protect the employees of a busines where ownership is transferred to someone else.
Before TUPE, transfer of a company from one employer to another would automatically terminate the employees’ contracts of employment. Usually this meant that existing employees would be made redundant.
TUPE was introduced in 1981 (with major amendments in 2006 and 2014) and applies to a wide range of business transactions that occur on a daily basis. It applies in cases where there is a “relevant transfer”, which is defined as the “transfer of an economic entity which retains its identity”. The courts use a range of factors to determine if TUPE applies, including
The type of organisation that has been transferred
Whether tangible and intangible assets have been transferred and their value
If the majority of employees have been taken on by the new employer
If any customers are transferred
How similar the activities are before and after the transfer
How long any activities are suspended for
Under TUPE, where a relevant transfer has taken place, the employees of the organisation being transferred automatically have their employment moved to the new owner.
For a relevant transfer to have taken place, it is the identity of the employer, and not the owner, that must have changed. Relevant transfers can include:
Mergers
Change of franchise
Sale of a partnership
Division of a company
Whereas the sale of shares or assets alone may not constitute a relevant transfer.
Two possible types of relevant transfer exist:
Business transfers, which occurs where an economic entity changes hands (this can be the whole or part of a business) but retains its identity after transfer. In other words, its operations must be essentially the same after the business changes hands.
A service provision change occurs where a company contracts out services, such as cleaning. In this context, a relevant transfer occurs when:
When a business enters into a new contract with a contractor
Where an existing contractor outsources their services to a subsequent contractor
When a business that had previously outsourced certain services then brings these services ‘in-house’.
As with business transfers, the activities carried out must be the same as they were prior to transfer.
If a relevant business transfer or service change has taken place, then TUPE applies to all employees employed by the original employer immediately before the transfer and automatically transfer the terms and conditions of employment, meaning that continuity of employment is maintained.
When a company is changing hands, employers have a duty to inform and consult the employees (or an appropriate representative) who may be affected by the transfer. This does not apply to employers that have less than ten employees. It is worth noting that consulting is a separate duty from informing and must be done with a view to reaching agreement with the employees or their representatives regarding the measures to be taken.
The employers must inform the employees or their representative:
That a transfer will be taking place
When this will occur
Why this is happening
About any measures that will be taken in respect of the employees
Employees do have a right to object to the transfer, but this can mean foregoing normal rights on dismissal, meaning that they will be regarded as having resigned.
Primarily, TUPE ensures the right to continuity of employment. This means that all existing employment terms and conditions transfer from one employer to another without interruption, and all pre-existing rights are preserved.
A failure to inform and consult can result in complaints to an Employment Tribunal. The maximum award if successful is up to 13 weeks’ pay for every affected employee.
If an employee is dismissed directly before or after your company changes hands, they may have been unfairly dismissed. Indeed, if it can be shown that the transfer was the principal or only reason for an employee’s dismissal, then it will be automatically unfair. However, if it can be shown that the transfer was not the principal reason for the dismissal, but that there was another substantial reason (for example, dismissal), then the dismissal may be fair.
Any effected employees, or representatives of these employees, who feel that their rights have been breached, are entitled to bring a complaint to an employment tribunal if this is no later than three months after the date of transfer. If the complaint is upheld, then these employees will be entitled compensation.
It should be noted that TUPE is relaxed where the exiting employer is insolvent as a form of protection for the new employer, who will be more tempted to rescue businesses that are financially struggling.
Click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert solicitors.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.