When internationally connected couples separate, one of the most decisive factors in the outcome of their divorce is where the case is heard. For those with global assets, business interests, or complex wealth structures, jurisdiction is more than a procedural step — it can shape disclosure requirements, financial outcomes, and privacy considerations.
In an increasingly mobile world, couples may have multiple homes, dual citizenship, or investments spanning several countries. When separation becomes likely, identifying which court has authority — and understanding the implications of that choice — is a crucial early stage in the process.
This guide explores how jurisdiction operates in high-value divorce cases, how the choice of forum can influence proceedings, and what qualities are important when instructing a lawyer experienced in cross-border family law.
| Jurisdiction | General Financial Framework | Disclosure Expectations | Approach to Maintenance | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| England and Wales | Broad judicial discretion; emphasis on fairness and needs | Comprehensive disclosure required | Courts can order long-term or needs-based maintenance | Offers flexible judicial assessment rather than fixed formulas |
| United States (varies by state) | “Equitable” distribution principles | Disclosure obligations differ | Maintenance rules vary widely | Outcomes depend heavily on the specific state’s legislation |
| Selected EU Member States | Often governed by matrimonial property regimes | Varies by jurisdiction | May be formula-based or limited | Predictable but sometimes less adaptable to individual cases |
| Middle Eastern jurisdictions | Religious or codified family law systems | Varies significantly | Often limited or structured differently | Legal principles may differ from English family law concepts |
| Offshore and international finance centres | Jurisdictional rules depend on local legislation | Disclosure procedures may be narrower | Maintenance provisions limited or unavailable | May require careful coordination and enforcement planning |
Jurisdiction refers to which country’s courts have the legal authority to handle the divorce. In cross-border marriages, more than one country may have potential jurisdiction, depending on where the parties have lived, worked, or hold assets.
Courts typically consider factors such as:
Because each jurisdiction applies different principles, determining where proceedings should be issued is often strategic. A solicitor experienced in international family law can help identify potential forums and assess their implications.
For high-value individuals, the forum in which proceedings are heard can affect matters such as financial disclosure, valuation of business assets, or recognition of trusts. Courts in some countries have broader discretion to determine financial awards, while others apply fixed property regimes or limited maintenance rules.
The differences between jurisdictions mean that timing and advice are critical. Understanding where proceedings can lawfully be brought — and what that means in practice — is an essential early step in protecting financial and personal interests.
“Forum shopping” refers to selecting the jurisdiction most connected to, and potentially most appropriate for, a client’s circumstances. This is lawful provided there is a genuine link to that country.
A lawyer with international experience will:
In international cases, proceedings issued first in a qualifying jurisdiction often take precedence, making early specialist advice crucial.
Each factor is assessed in light of the case’s overall context, and may determine whether one court or another is best placed to hear the matter.
International families often hold assets and interests in several countries, such as:
Such diversity adds complexity to issues of disclosure, enforcement, and taxation. The lawyer’s role is to coordinate with experts in relevant jurisdictions, anticipate potential conflicts of law, and ensure that proceedings are conducted in the most appropriate and coherent forum.
Different countries apply different standards of privacy in family proceedings. Some restrict public access entirely; others allow limited reporting or inspection of financial documents.
For clients with public profiles or commercially sensitive interests, choosing a jurisdiction that aligns with their privacy expectations can be a significant consideration. A solicitor experienced in confidential divorce work will advise on:
Balancing confidentiality with fairness and procedural integrity is an integral part of international divorce strategy.
Selecting the most appropriate forum requires legal expertise that spans family, financial, and international law. A solicitor experienced in this field will:
Few family lawyers practise extensively in this space, and even fewer specialise in managing both the legal and reputational dimensions of international divorce.
Engaging a specialist early ensures that decisions about jurisdiction are informed, timely, and aligned with long-term objectives.
Jurisdiction defines which court has authority to hear a case. Forum shopping refers to selecting, from among those options, the forum most appropriate for the client’s situation.
The English courts are known for detailed disclosure processes and a broad, fairness-based approach to financial outcomes, which can be advantageous in certain cases.
Sometimes, but only one set of proceedings will usually continue once jurisdiction is established. Timing can therefore be a significant factor.
This increases complexity, as enforcement and valuation differ by jurisdiction. Coordinated advice from international lawyers is essential.
Yes — provided that the chosen country has a genuine and lawful connection to the marriage or one of the parties.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.
