Originating from the case of Barder v Barder in 1987, a Barder event is defined as a new event that invalidates the main or fundamental assumption on which a financial remedy order was made and which can ultimately challenge that order. This type of event can be advantageous over the old regime as it allows for decisions to be set aside without having to make a formal application for permission.
If you’re considering or going through a divorce, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
The grounds for a Barder event are mostly based on the decisions of the judge, however in addition there are four conditions which must be satisfied.
The first is that new event has transpired since the order was made and overturns the main assumptions on which the order was given, so that if leave to appeal were to be allowed, it would be likely or certain to succeed.
The second is that the new event transpired in a relatively short period of time after the order was made. This period of time should not exceed a few months.
The third is that the application to appeal out of time is made promptly in the context of the case.
Finally, the last condition is that leave to appeal out of time would not put third parties at a disadvantage where they have acquired, in good faith, interests in property which are subject to the relevant order.
In order to be able to use a Barder event effectively, the event must be unforeseen and unforeseeable. Barder events are not set in stone and are often decided on specific facts. The courts tend to be restrictive in their approach to them and no one decision in one case is certain to be the same for another. As a result, Barder events are very rare, as changes to court orders are not preferred and should be used in exceptional circumstances only.
Barder events are usually considered and examined in cases involving:
Change in value of assets
Change in employment status
Death
Remarriage or cohabitation where it was concealed
Change in housing needs
Inheritance
Barder events are not applicable in the following:
Cases of redundancy
Change in calculation of an asset
Straightforward remarriage
A change in a child’s living circumstances can mean that the initial assumption the original order was based on is no longer applicable, so an appeal would be possible and most likely successful. An example is where a child’s primary carer changes from the mother to the father, meaning that the mother no longer has housing needs as high as she would have had when the order was made. As result, this means that the amount given to the mother can be reduced.
Depending on the facts of the case, receiving inheritance can constitute a Barder event. If an order was based on needs, this can affect the possibility of inheritance being a Barder event. For example, if the inheritance means that one party no longer needs the interest in the former matrimonial home to discharge debt, and the mortgage can be redeemed, then the assumption on which the order was made no longer applies.
The order first needs to be set aside. This means that the grounds on which this can happen must include a subsequent event, which is unforeseen and unforeseeable at the time the order was made and which invalidates the reason on which the order was made.
Barder events have to be exceptional. It is important to remember that in normal times, pre-pandemic, they were more often than not refused. In BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87, Mostyn J suggested that it was unlikely that the pandemic constituted a Barder event. However, whilst a similar application was rejected in HW v WW [2021] EWFC B20, the court held that the pandemic and its effect on key assets could potentially constitute a Barder event.
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.