Locations we serve
Locations we serve
Locations we serve
Other Services
020 7404 9390
Available 24 hours

What is defamation?

The law surrounding defamation is a very important tool in protecting businesses and individuals reputations. The explosion in the use of social media means that everyone is at risk of a defamatory statement being made publically available to a wide audience.  

Defamation trials are generally in front of just a judge without a jury. The judge decides whether the words are damaging to the claimants reputation considering their ordinary and natural meaning.

If you have been defamed, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert Reputation & Privacy solicitors.



What is a defamatory statement?

Defamatory means that the statement would either damage, or could damage, the reputation of the affected claimant. What will be considered is whether the statement would lower the claimant in the estimations of right-thinking members of society generally.

The defamatory statement also has to identify or refer to the claimant and be published to a third party. Identification of the claimant is not always straightforward and where this is disputed or uncertain, it will have to be determined by the court. 

The Defamation Act 2013 introduced the need for the publication of the defamatory statement to cause (or be likely to cause) serious harm to the claimants reputation. Injury to feelings is not sufficient and damage to an individuals reputation has to be proved. A business will not have suffered serious harm unless the statement has caused, or is likely to cause, serious financial loss. 

What are the types of defamation?

So you may be wondering what does defamation mean? Defamation actually has two separate branches, which both concern the publication of defamatory statements:

  • Libel
  • Slander

what is Libel?

Libel is the publication of a statement in a permanent and lasting form, such as:

  • In writing
  • Broadcasts
  • Stage productions


Slander is more transient and covers methods such as:

  • Speech
  • Gestures
  • Conduct

It can be harder to prove slander without any evidence that the statement was made. It also requires proof of special damage (financial loss) as well as serious harm, unless one of the exemptions apply:

  • An allegation that the claimant has committed a crime that they can face a prison sentence for.
  • If the statement was meant to disparage the claimant in relation to his office, profession, calling, trade or business at the time of publication.

Who can make a claim of defamation?

Individuals can bring a claim of defamation if they were the person defamed but they cannot bring it on behalf of another person (for example, in relation to someone that is deceased that has been defamed).

Claims can also be brought by business and organisations, trade unions and other legal entities. Governing bodies, public authorities, political bodies and unincorporated associations are not able to bring defamation claims.

Claimants have one year from date that the defamatory statement was made to bring an action for defamation. 


There are various remedies that can be used in these cases. Often what the claimant will want is an apology or statement correcting the defamation or retracting it to correct the issue caused. The offer to amend was previously introduced by the Defamation Act 1996 and allowed the defendant to acknowledge an innocent mistake and correct it with an apology, published correction and payment of damages and costs. This process can only be used before the service of the defence. The offer is then either accepted or rejected by the claimant, but unless the claimant can show that the statement was malicious, the offer provides the defendant with a complete defence.


Damages can be awarded to the claimant and can be compensatory or exemplary. The court will consider the:

  • Level of injury caused.
  • Seriousness of the defamation. 
  • Extent and nature of the publication.
  • Any mitigating factors. 

The award of damages can be seen as vindicating the claimants reputation as well as providing compensation for the distress and humiliation that was caused by the statement. Exemplary or punitive damages are used as a punishment, particularly where the defendant is a business that acted negligently.  


Interim injunctions to prevent f

The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.


Ayesha Vardag

Founder & President Ayesha Vardag Founder & President Divorce & Family
“Ayesha Vardag - Britain's top divorce lawyer.” 
The Telegraph

Stephen Bence

Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bence Vardags CEO
“Dr Stephen Bence is a financial genius.” 
Lewis Marks KC

David Lister

Senior Partner - Divorce & Family David Lister
“Brilliant with a real spark which clients love” 
Legal 500
This site uses cookies. Find out more. Use of this site is deemed as consent.   OK   CUSTOMISE