As a nation we love our pets. Animals often form an integral part of family life, with disputes on pet custody becoming one of the aspects of concern in divorce proceedings. We have witnessed news stories of high-profile celebrities battle out the care arrangements of these four-legged friends during their divorce, with the likes of Ant McPartlin and his ex-wife agreeing shared custody of their chocolate Labrador, whereas Johnny Depp had to relinquish custody of his and Amber Heard’s dogs.
If you’re considering or going through a divorce and are concerned with what will happen to your pets, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
It is common to conflate custody arrangements relating to children with pets. These areas of law are, however, unrelated.
Child custody arrangements, on the one hand, are dealt with under the Children Act 1989, which place the child’s welfare as the paramount consideration in proceedings and looks to factors including the child’s wishes and their educational needs.
On the other hand, pets are treated as property under English law. This equates animals to the likes any other property owned by the couple that are dealt with during the divorce, for example, household furniture and cars. As such, the court’s approach in these cases does not look to the day-to-day caregiving duties or the emotional needs of the animal in question, but rather the same factors taken into consideration when handling ordinary assets. These may (though non-exhaustively) include:
While the court can make maintenance-related financial orders on divorce, these do not extend to the maintenance of pets. These costs may, however, be factored into your income needs for spousal maintenance as part of the financial remedy process. This is particularly pertinent where such maintenance costs are extensive, for example, with horses or a pet that has a chronic condition requiring expensive treatment.
There are several ways that someone can protect their ownership of a pet during the divorce proceedings:
Pre or postnuptial agreements set out what would happen if the relationship were to breakdown. It will cover issues such as childcare arrangement as well as the division of finances and assets. These arrangements can cover what would happen to any pets if the parties were to separate in the same way that this can be covered in a Will. These agreements must be considered fair to be upheld in the courts.
If there is not already an agreement in place, the parties can mutually agree on a course of action amongst themselves or in negotiation between their lawyers. To do so independently of the courts helps reduce costs and any potential conflict, with the final agreement being formally documented.
In the event an agreement cannot be reached, pet custody arrangements may fall under ongoing financial proceedings. It should, however, be noted that the courts are typically unwilling to make orders in this regard. This can be seen in RK v RK, where Mr Justice Mostyn made clear that he was wholly unwilling to deal with the issue of pet ownership. Cases like IX v IY have therefore seen parties resort to specialist dog mediators to resolve these matters.
It is also worth noting the risk that exists with any litigation: mounting costs. Last year, a case saw £25,000 in legal fees being spent in a court battle over arrangements for a cat named Ozzy. However, the courts are generally reluctant to spend much time hearing evidence in relation to pet custody, wanting to focus their attention on childcare and financial arrangements.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.