It is common for couples to share in the responsibility of handling their finances, which is why many opt to open to a joint bank account to facilitate this. Joint accounts can be configured in various ways, requiring either both parties’ signatures or just one for transactions. In general, joint accounts present few problems for couples and are, as such, a favoured means of dealing with finances.
Issues nonetheless arise where the couple in question chooses to split, particularly where this lacks amicability. In instances such as these, consent poses a huge cause for concern, with separating parties potentially attempting to make one-sided changes to the count or, worse, withdrawals.
If you’re considering or going through a divorce, click below for a free initial consultation with one of our expert divorce solicitors.
There are various concerns a party may have when separating from a spouse with whom they share a joint account.
Where parties are joint signatories to a joint bank account and one party wishes to close it, that party must first obtain the consent of the other party. The bank is not able to take steps to close the account until they have received confirmation from both parties, respectively, that they consent to the account being closed.
On the other hand, if the joint bank account is set up as requiring only a single signatory, it can closed by one party acting alone, without the need for obtaining the other’s consent. Importantly, however, the money in this account is still regarded as joint marital property. For this reason, the transfer of any ‘joint money’ by one party to a personal account will be taken into account by the courts during division of the couple’s financial assets.
It is also worth noting for these purposes that if there exists any debt in relation to the joint account, both parties will be liable regardless of who incurred the debt.
A bank should not authorise the removal of your name without your consent. If this has, or could, occur you must contact your bank immediately. Where this happens during divorce proceedings, the courts are also able to consider this an improper use of marital wealth.
If you are, at present, going through a divorce - or you otherwise anticipate that your spouse may soon begin proceedings - it is imperative that you obtain legal advice to determine the necessary steps for addressing any funds held jointly. It is also important that these steps are taken as quickly as possible, particularly where you are experiencing concern that your name has been removed from the joint account.
Any money withdrawn by your ex remains a matrimonial asset. The court views this type of behaviour unfavourably and it could significantly impact the overall financial settlement.
It’s important to note that either party is legally entitled to empty a joint account of all funds. If you have concerns that your spouse may dissipate funds before the divorce settlement, you can notify the bank and request intervention without the other party’s consent. The bank can then freeze the account and ensure that any actions require instructions from both parties.
However, not all banks will authorize this kind of action based on a single party’s instructions, so you will need to consult with your individual bank. Alternatively, you can seek an injunction in certain situations.
You can apply for a freezing injunction, but you must demonstrate to the court that there is a genuine risk of those assets being dissipated if the order is not granted.
Freezing an account requires careful consideration. While it can safeguard your financial position during the settlement process, it may also disrupt important regular payments, such as mortgage or loan instalments.
When court-based divorce proceedings reach the financial ordering process, it is mandatory for both parties to provide full financial disclosure by way of Form E. As part of this disclosure, each party must provide 12 months’ bank statements for all accounts in their sole or joint name. This will provide visibility with regards to the joint account, allowing record to be taken of any transactions/happenings since the removal of your name. Where these records show significant unilateral changes made to the account during divorce proceedings, the courts are again able to consider this an improper use of marital wealth. This remains the case irrespective of what contributions you or your spouse made to the account.
Where the relationship in question begins to show sign of future separation, it may well be advisable to change the joint account from a sole to joint signatory one. This ensures that both parties’ consent ought to be obtained where movement of funds is to be made.
It is also advisable in these cases that you take the time to discuss with your spouse how you would like the funds to be divided. This might help facilitate a mutual agreement that removes the need for any later acrimonious disputes surrounding the joint account and/or your finances. It is important to realise, and note, here that each party is entitled to
It may also be advisable to stop any payments into the joint account and instead pay funds into a separate, personal one. However, you do need to take into account any outgoings that may require funds being added to the joint account, such as mortgage payments and direct debits for utilities and mobile phone charges.
Click here to view our guide to the division of assets in divorce.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). Its VAT number is 99 001 7230.
Vardags uses the term ‘Partner’ as a professional title only, to describe a Senior Solicitor, Employee or Consultant with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications (whether legally qualified or otherwise) to merit the title. Our Partners are not partners in the legal sense. They are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. Similarly, the term ’Director’ is a professional title only, to describe an employee or consultant of Vardags with relevant experience, expertise and qualifications to merit the title. It does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited.
A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of ’Director’ and ’Partner’ together with their official status is available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office.