Vardags — Leading solicitors for high net worth individuals

High court upholds will in favour of handyman

By Christopher Hall -

High court upholds will in favour of handyman

Bob the Builder’s claim that he can fix anything would seem to include wills following the judgment published on 1st May in the case of Sharp and Hutchins EWHC 1240 (Ch).

In this case Ronald Butcher, a man in his seventies when he died, wrote a will in favour of his handy man Daniel Sharp (“Danny”), who would do odd jobs for him free of charge. Ms Lesley Anderson QC decided that Mr Butcher was free to leave his estate to whomever he wished.

Mr Butcher had no living relatives, and whilst the person contesting the will, Evelyn Hutchins, had been a close friend of the deceased in the years leading up to his death she had visited him less often. By contrast Danny had enjoyed “mutual chat and banter and human interest stories,” such as tales of Danny’s son Archie’s boxing success. Danny had never sought to influence Mr Butcher and was deeply shocked when Mr Butcher told him that he had left his estate to him.

It is a fundamental principle of English law that people should be free to leave their property as they choose. However before a will is admitted to probate the Court must be satisfied that a testator knew and approved of its contents.

On the facts of the case based on the witness evidence, which is so important in such cases, Ms Anderson decided that Mr Butcher both had capacity and approved of the contents of the will. She decided that the test in the court of appeal decision of Gill v Woodall EWCA had been fulfilled.

Even though Mr Butcher did not instruct a solicitor to prepare the will and did not ask his doctor to witness the will, but another plumber and an equity release scheme salesman, Ms Anderson found that Danny had produced enough evidence to prove the will. This is despite Mrs Hutchins being the attorney for Mr Butcher at the time.

This case highlights the high degree of proof that is required to show a signed and written will is invalid. Indeed a recent Australian case even allowed a will written on an iPhone to be admitted to probate. The Law commission is preparing a report on what form wills should take in the modern age, nearly two hundred years since the 1837 Wills Act.

The moral of the story is pay regular visits to your loved ones and keep up to date with their interests if you wish to be included. Most importantly check what “Bob” is doing during his frequent friendly visits!

If you would like to know more about the issues covered in this article, Vardags offers a free consultation to qualifying individuals.

For high net worth and ultra high net worth individuals or their companies, our confidential enquiry line is staffed 24 hours. Call 020 7404 9390 today.

Christopher Hall

Christopher Hall heads up the private client practice at Vardags. He has exceptional experience of complex offshore trust-based tax planning structures and t...