After weeks of speculation, Mr Justice Nicol has handed down his judgement: Johnny Depp has lost his libel claim against the publishers of the Sun newspaper for labelling him a wife-beater. The court held that, on the balance of probabilities, the Sun had proved the substantial truth of their allegations against Mr Depp.
The case, which spanned 16 days at the Royal Courts of Justice, attracted widespread media coverage and offered a rare insight into the tumultuous relationship of the Hollywood couple’s marriage and private life.
And yet, despite all of this turmoil and the fact a judgement has been handed down, the dispute is by no means over. Mr Depp’s legal team labelled the decision “as perverse as it is bewildering” and stated that “The judgement is so flawed that it would be ridiculous for Mr Depp not to appeal this decision.” His team will have 21 days to file their application for permission to appeal.
While focus has so far centred on proceedings in London, the public’s gaze will soon be transported to the US for the next showdown – this time directly between Mr Depp and Ms Heard. The libel claim, brought by Mr Depp, relates to a December opinion piece which Heard penned for The Washington Post. In this article, Ms Heard discussed her experience of domestic abuse and although she did not mention Mr Depp by name, he viewed the inference as grave enough to lodge a $50 million defamation suit.
Some have questioned whether yesterday’s judgment will result in Mr Depp settling his US claim. However, Jenny Afia, who represented Mr Depp, immediately looked ahead to next year’s case, expressing her hope that the “ongoing libel proceedings in America are equitable, with both parties providing full disclosure rather than one side strategically cherry picking what evidence can and cannot be relied upon.”
Buoyed by their victory, Ms Heard’s team also addressed the upcoming suit, promising that they will be “presenting even more voluminous evidence in the US.”
With new US proceedings scheduled for 2021, and an appeal likely to be lodged in England, Monday’s judgement is unlikely to be the end of the story - in fact, it is probably just the end of the first act.
Vardags Limited is a limited company trading as Vardags, Company No 7199468, registered in England and Wales, having its registered office at 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG. Vardags is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 535955). The term “Director” is used to refer to a director of Vardags Limited or to a non-legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags Limited with equivalent standing; the term “Director” does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited. The term “Partner” is used to refer to a legally qualified director of Vardags Limited or a legally qualified employee or consultant of Vardags Limited with equivalent standing; the title “Partner” does not necessarily imply that the relevant individual is a director of Vardags Limited and does not imply that they are a partner in the legalsense. Our Partners are not liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of Vardags Limited. A list of the directors of Vardags Limited and a list of the names of those using the title of “Director” or “Partner” together with their official status available for inspection at Vardags’ registered office. VAT number: 99 001 7230.