The criminal courts have been forced, she asserted, to find ways to accommodate children and other vulnerable witnesses because the injustice of such vulnerable members of society suffering abuse with no legal redress was too great to tolerate.
The criminal courts have introduced ‘special measures’ for enabling children to give evidence, such as via video link. Why, she asked, should the family courts not do the same?
She finished her talk on an open-ended note, somewhat unsure of where the family courts might be heading in this regard, due to the variety of opinion on the matter – even among her colleagues in the Supreme Court. But she emphasised the important point that listening to children and taking into account their wishes and feelings does not mean that their wishes will dictate the eventual outcome.
Baroness Hale issued a compelling argument for change, while detailing some of the complex reasons why others in the family division have reservations. It is clear where she stands.
As she succinctly noted:
“I am old enough to remember care proceedings under the Children and Young Persons Act 1969. The child had physically to be brought before the court, unless he or she was five or under. Children of course are present at children’s hearings in Scotland. We know from cases in the European Court of Human Rights that it is standard practice for them to be present at least some of the time in children’s cases in Germany. If all these courts can cope, why can’t we?”
Baroness Hale’s speech can be read in full here.
If you would like to know more about the issues covered in this article, Vardags offers a free consultation to qualifying individuals.
For high net worth and ultra high net worth individuals or their companies, our confidential enquiry line is staffed 24 hours. Call 020 7404 9390 today.